In partnership with
The 1990s were boom times for fertility medicine. Technologies were improving every year. Fertility clinics were opening across the country. Tens of thousands of Americans who wanted children were finding hope in seemingly miraculous procedures that had only been around for a decade or two.
In this new medical landscape, genetic material that could make new life was no longer confined to the body, but entrusted to fertility doctors and laboratories. And in 1995, reporters discovered that two of the most famous doctors in the field, who worked at a clinic at the University of California Irvine, had committed one of the biggest ethical breaches in U.S. medical history: They’d made a practice of stealing eggs from some patients and giving them to others, without the women’s knowledge or consent.
I tell the story of these doctors—and one of their victims, who learned in 1995 that she had a 7-year-old child she’d never met—in the third episode of One Year: 1995. To put myself in the shoes of Americans who were absorbing the news of the scandal as it developed, I read a lot of old coverage of the fertility industry from the ‘80s and ‘90s, a time when the new possibilities of assisted reproduction provoked both hope and fear. Here are some of the most fascinating pieces I found. —Christina Cauterucci
The Pulitzer PrizesChristina Cauterucci: “The Orange County Register broke the story of the fertility clinic’s abuses, and they won a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage over the course of the year. The paper’s reporting is full of colorful details about the doctor at the center of it all—who owned five racehorses and drove a Ferrari with a cocky vanity plate—and the whistleblowers who exposed him.”
Karen Brandon
Chicago TribuneCC: “I interviewed Renee Ballou, whose eggs were stolen during a fertility procedure, about what it was like to learn in 1995 that another patient had given birth to her genetic child, born from her egg. The Chicago Tribune’s 1996 telling of Renee’s story gave me a starting point for our conversation.”
[NOTE: This article is no longer available on the Tribune’s site, but if you click save below you can read it in Pocket.]
Margaret MarshWanda Ronner
Literary HubCC: “Every story about reproductive health care is informed by cultural anxieties about women’s roles in public life. This excerpt from The Pursuit of Parenthood gives a smart analysis of how those anxieties showed up in the 1980s, when doctors and media outlets blamed feminism for a supposed epidemic of infertility in the United States.”
Philip Elmer-Dewitt
TimeCC: “This 1991 Time magazine cover story is fun to read with the benefit of hindsight—one thing I love about history podcasts—because it’s remarkably optimistic about GIFT, the procedure invented by the doctor at the heart of our story. (Eventually, IVF would prove much more successful, and GIFT lost its shine.) I love the writer’s lyrical description of how the procedures worked: One benefit of GIFT, he writes, is that the embryo ‘drifts quietly into the uterus,’ rather than being ‘squirted, rather violently’ as in IVF. That didn’t end up mattering at all!”
Marcida Dodson
Los Angeles TimesCC: “When GIFT was first developed, people thought it would work better than IVF and other early fertility treatments because it seemed to mimic the ‘natural’ insemination process. Even the pope thought so: GIFT became the only Vatican-approved fertility procedure.”
Peter Imber
YouTubeCC: “When the scandal broke, ABC News’ Nightline producers realized that they had old footage of the doctor and one couple he’d treated in previous years. Here, the couple confronts the possibility that their extra eggs or embryos were given to other patients.”
John Burgess
Orange Coast MagazineCC: “This Orange Coast magazine piece on how a team of reporters uncovered the fertility clinic’s abuses should be adapted into a film, à la Spotlight. It’s got whistleblowers, leaked documents, and a race for the scoop of a lifetime.”
Michael Ollove
The Pew TrustsCC: “When I started reporting this story, I assumed that the scandal would have sparked a movement for fertility industry reform in the ‘90s. That’s not at all what happened. As this piece explains, the industry remains largely unregulated, in part because it’s hard to write legislation about embryos without staking a position on when life begins.”
From our partners
SlateListen to the full episode here.
Pocket CollectionsGet to know what’s behind your favorite Slate podcast episodes — straight from the hosts’ research.
Christina Cauterucci
Christina Cauterucci is a Slate senior writer.